首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于CPS架构的数字化战略能力构建——德国工业4.0的管理体系与转型实践
引用本文:董小英,胡燕妮,戴亦舒,叶丽莎.基于CPS架构的数字化战略能力构建——德国工业4.0的管理体系与转型实践[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2019,31(5):85-98.
作者姓名:董小英  胡燕妮  戴亦舒  叶丽莎
作者单位:北京大学光华管理学院,北京,100871;中国信息通信研究院政策与经济研究所,北京,100191;北京工商大学计算机与信息工程学院,北京,100048
摘    要:在全球再工业化的背景下,网络实体系统(CPS)成为各国制造业发展的制高点。文章以服务主导逻辑为理论视角,基于CPS技术架构与功能,解读其数字映射能力、资源集成能力与价值共创能力三层战略能力,并针对能力构建过程中的管理挑战对德国政府与制造企业的工业4.0管理体系进行了分析。研究发现,中德制造业数字化转型的能力构建重点不同,中国关注数字映射能力和资源集成能力,德国则重点部署资源集成能力。两国政府在工业4.0的推进上均发挥了战略引导作用,德国在发挥创新平台战略价值和相关标准制定上的经验值得借鉴。

关 键 词:网络实体系统  服务主导逻辑  工业4.0  制造业转型  数字化战略能力
收稿时间:2019/5/23 0:00:00

German Industry 4.0 Management System and Transformation Enlightenment: The Construction of Strategic Capabilities Based on CPS Architecture
DONG Xiaoying,HU Yanni,DAI Yishu and YE Lisha.German Industry 4.0 Management System and Transformation Enlightenment: The Construction of Strategic Capabilities Based on CPS Architecture[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications:Social Science Edition,2019,31(5):85-98.
Authors:DONG Xiaoying  HU Yanni  DAI Yishu and YE Lisha
Institution:Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China,Digital Economy Research Institute, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, Beijing 100191, China,School of Computer and Information Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China and Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract:In the context of global re-industrialization, cyber physical systems (CPS) has become the key to develop manufacturing industries. This paper takes the theoretical perspective of Service Dominant Logic to interpret the three-level strategic capabilities construction of CPS, which are digital mapping capability, resource integration capability and value creation capability, based on its technology architecture. Besides, this paper addresses the management challenges in the capability construction with German Industry 4.0 management system including government and manufacturing enterprises. The study finds that China and Germany have different emphasis on the capability construction. China is concerned with digital mapping capability and resource integration capability, while Germany is focusing on the deployment of resource integration capability. Both governments have played a strategic guiding role in the advancement of Industry 4.0. It is worth learning from Germany in the development of innovation platforms and related standards.
Keywords:cyber physical systems  service dominant logic  Industry 4  0  manufacturing industry transformation  strategic capabilities
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号