欧盟新近国际投资协定中的间接征收条款研究

欧盟在TTIP草案中设置的间接征收条款主要采取了兼具行为效果与行为目的理论模式。该种模式并没有对构成间接征收要素中的合理期待、比例原则、透明度等关键问题进行规定。只有在充分认识欧盟提出的间接征收模式缺陷的基础之上，才能更好地完善中国国际投资协定中的间接征收条款。同时，经济效益理论与风险承担理论对于完善间接征收的补偿条款也有着重要的意义，也能更好地对投资者和东道国的利益进行平衡。《中国—韩国自由贸易协定》是对间接征收规定得较为全面的自由贸易协定，结合欧盟的TTIP草案，还有诸多需要完善的地方。

Research on the Indirect Expropriation Article of the EU New International Investment Treaty

Although the academic circle and practice field have proposed a lot of suggestions，it still need to be perfect. In the EU TTIP draft，the indirect expropriation article took the mode of sole effect doctrine and police powers doctrine. However，this EU mode has not regulated on the legitimate expectation、proportion test and transparency. So we should understand the shortcoming of the EU mode to perfect China's indirect expropriation article. Meanwhile the doctrines of economic efficiency and risk allocation are significant for perfecting China's indirect expropriation. China-Korea FTA fully regulated the indirect expropriation，but combined with the EU mode，it is needed to be perfect. We should analysis deeply，for preparing for the China-EU Bilateral Investment Treaty.