Short report: Understanding the process of multilevel suicide prevention research trials |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia;2. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia;1. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA;2. Gilling School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;3. Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania;4. Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania;5. Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania;6. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK;7. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;1. School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, No. 2 South Taibai Street, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, PR China;2. Shaanxi Xi ''an Yanta District, Shida Road, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, PR China;1. Department of Agricultural Education and Communication at the University of Florida, 213 Rolfs Hall, PO Box 110540, 32611, Gainesville, FL, United States;2. University of Florida. 218 Rolfs Hall, PO Box 110540, 32611 Gainesville, FL, United States;3. University of Florida. 3028B McCarty Hall D, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States;4. University of Florida. 113C Bryant Hall, PO Box 112060, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States;1. School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW, 2751, Australia;2. School of Business, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith NSW, 2751, Australia;3. School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, 25A Barker Rd., Strathfield, NSW, Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper reviews process evaluations associated with multilevel suicide prevention research trials. Process evaluations can provide important information about how multilevel suicide prevention models are implemented, their mechanisms of impact, and the context and elements of implementation that mediate effectiveness. Out of 42 papers identified, only four met selection criteria for including a process evaluation. Of these four, there was large variation in the level of detail provided, and only two studies specifically focused on the process of implementing a multilevelsuicide prevention model. Future trials should include targeted process evaluation, which can benefit a range of knowledge users. |
| |
| Keywords: | Process evaluation suicide prevention multilevel trials systems approach complex interventions |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
