首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

重大复杂的共同犯罪案件适用认罪认罚程序研究
引用本文:李素颖,苏亚江.重大复杂的共同犯罪案件适用认罪认罚程序研究[J].河北工程大学学报(社会科学版),2023,40(4):103-110.
作者姓名:李素颖  苏亚江
作者单位:河北省邯郸市人民检察院, 河北 邯郸 056005
基金项目:2021年最高人民检察院检察应用理论研究课题
摘    要:重大复杂的共同犯罪案件有其自身的特殊性,认罪认罚制度注重强调诉讼效率,对重大复杂的共同犯罪案件不能像一般案件一样不分诉讼阶段一体适用认罪认罚制度,以免认罪自愿性和供述真实性方面可能存在的问题被掩盖,进而影响案件定罪量刑,甚至导致案件处理偏离公平正义。重大复杂的共同犯罪案件适用认罪认罚制度,应当按照“首重公正,兼顾效率”的原则调校程序,构建检察主导下的程序分流机制和事实查明机制,努力实现公正与效率并重的诉讼目标。

关 键 词:共同犯罪  认罪认罚  检察主导  程序分流  事实查明机制
收稿时间:2023/9/12 0:00:00

Research on the Procedures for the Application of Guilty Admission and Punishment Acceptance in Serious and Complex Joint Crime Cases
Authors:LI Suying  SU Yajiang
Institution:Handan People''s Procuratorate of Hebei Province, Handan, Hebei 056005, China
Abstract:Serious and complex joint criminal cases have their own special characteristics while Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishments with Leniency system emphasizes the efficiency of litigation. In this sense, although this system is usually adopted in ordinary cases at any stage of litigation, it cannot be applied to serious and complex joint crimes just in case that potential problems caused by the voluntariness and truthfulness of confession are concealed, which may affect the conviction and sentence or even the fairness and justice. When applying Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishments with Leniency in serious and complex joint crime cases, we should adjust the procedure based on the principle of "justice first and full consideration of efficiency", build a procedural diversion mechanism and fact-finding mechanism led by the prosecution office, and strive to achieve both justice and efficiency in litigation.
Keywords:joint crime  pleading guilty and accepting punishments with leniency  prosecution dominance  procedural diversion  fact finding mechanism
点击此处可从《河北工程大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《河北工程大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号