首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

申请执行期间所达成还款协议之效力分析
引用本文:王军,余冬爱.申请执行期间所达成还款协议之效力分析[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,24(2):227-231.
作者姓名:王军  余冬爱
作者单位:1. 复旦大学,法学院,上海,200433
2. 上海市高级人民法院,上海,200031
摘    要:最高法院执行办公室以“批复”的形式确认在申请强制执行期间,双方当事人所达成的还款协议具有确立新的债权债务关系的效力,一方可以另一方未履行该协议提起诉讼。由于批复本身缺乏普适性效力,且内容不够完善,导致实践中各地作法不一。赋予还款协议确立新债权债务关系的效力有其切实的必要性和充分的理论基础,实践操作中,受诉法院应当严格依照法理,在尊重判决效力的前提下,区分前诉不同结案方式采用相应的审理程序。

关 键 词:申请执行期间  还款协议  和解协议  执行和解
文章编号:1004-1710(2006)02-0227-05
修稿时间:2005年12月4日

An Analysis of the Efficacy of the Returning Agreement Made in the Term of Application for Executing Judgment
WANG Jun,YU Dong-ai.An Analysis of the Efficacy of the Returning Agreement Made in the Term of Application for Executing Judgment[J].Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University,2006,24(2):227-231.
Authors:WANG Jun  YU Dong-ai
Abstract:According to the "Official Written Reply" made by the Executive Bureau of the Supreme People's Court,the returning agreement has the efficacy to establish a new relationship of debt.However,there exist inconsistencies in implementation of the "Reply" due to its constraints.This paper argues that if it is to acquire efficacy to establish a new relationship of debt, the returning agreement must be of genuine necessity and of adequate theoretical foundation.In practice,the court should adopt corresponding hearing procedure according to the different ending manner of the former case and in the premise of the deference to the efficacy of judgment.
Keywords:the term of application for executing judgment  the returning agreement  compromise agreement  reconciliation  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号