首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中加经济诈欺刑事立法比较研究
引用本文:杨春洗,王文华. 中加经济诈欺刑事立法比较研究[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001, 14(4): 384-391
作者姓名:杨春洗  王文华
作者单位:北京大学 法学院,北京 100871
摘    要:基于我国经济诈欺犯罪的现状,从经济诈欺刑事立法的形式、该类犯罪的主观要素、客观方面要素、刑罚设置以及两国刑事法学界和司法界对该种犯罪不同反应的观念形成等五个方面,对中加经济诈欺刑事立法作以比较研究和相关评介.加拿大的二元立法形式,判断具体罪的主、客观要素是否构成时的"危险境地说”,以及对该罪的刑罚观皆有其可取之处,希望对我国抗制破坏社会主义经济秩序的犯罪能有所裨益.

关 键 词:经济诈欺犯罪   加拿大   中国  比较
文章编号:1002-3194(2001)04-0384-08
修稿时间:2000-09-25

A Comparative Study of the laws of Chinese and Ganadian Economic Fraudulent Grimes
YAHG Chun-xi WANG Wen-hua. A Comparative Study of the laws of Chinese and Ganadian Economic Fraudulent Grimes[J]. Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2001, 14(4): 384-391
Authors:YAHG Chun-xi WANG Wen-hua
Abstract:Based on the present situation of economic fraudulent crimes in China, the paper makes a comparison between Chinese and Canadian criminal laws of economic fraud in five aspects: the legal forms, the subjective elements (mens rea),the objective elements(actus reus), the device of sentences and the different historical backgrounds and legal reactions toward economic fraudulent crimes. It points out that Canada has its unique ways in coping with such crimes mainly as follows: two-form legislation style, the concept of "perilous situation" of judging particular crime's subjective elements and objective elements as well as the sense of punishment of economic frauclulent crimes, from which merits China drawing the experiences.
Keywords:economic fraudulent crimes  Canada  China  comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号