首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“人类学写作”的质疑
引用本文:吴秋林.“人类学写作”的质疑[J].重庆文理学院学报,2011,30(2):42-44.
作者姓名:吴秋林
作者单位:贵州民族学院民族学与社会学院,贵州,贵阳,550025
摘    要:文学人类学不存在所谓的写作.文学写作是虚构的,而文化人类学的阐释则和文学创作的虚构相去善远.文化人类学所谓的写作应该是记录性的,不是写作性的.它们一个是文化现实的基本记录,一个是虚构性的写作.

关 键 词:人类学写作  文学写作  记录  虚构

The Doubts on "Anthropology Writing"
WU Qiu-lin.The Doubts on "Anthropology Writing"[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences,2011,30(2):42-44.
Authors:WU Qiu-lin
Institution:College of Ethnology and Sociology, Guizhou Nationalities College, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, China
Abstract:Literary anthropology does not have the so-called writing. Literary writing is the fictions; however, the explanations of cultural anthropology are different from the fictions of literature creation. The so-called cultural anthropology writing is documentary but notjust the writing, and one is the basic document of cultural reality and the other is the fictive writing.
Keywords:anthropology writing  literary writing  document  fictions
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆文理学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆文理学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号