首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

宜严或宜宽:公诉证据标准再议
引用本文:胡之芳. 宜严或宜宽:公诉证据标准再议[J]. 学术探索, 2011, 0(4): 49-54
作者姓名:胡之芳
作者单位:湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭,411105
基金项目:湖南省人民检察院检察理论研究课题(XJ2009D04)
摘    要:公诉证据标准应当低于有罪判决证明标准抑或与之保持一致,是谓公诉证据标准的宽严之辩。对公诉证据标准概念的正确理解是讨论该问题的前提。西方国家关于公诉证据标准的规定对我们有所启示,但不宜简单照搬。通过对公诉证据标准宽严之辩的梳理,从公诉证据标准的相关理论和实践状况分析,我国应当坚持公诉证据标准与有罪判决证明标准的一致性,同时出于表述上严谨性的考虑,我国公诉证据标准宜适当修正。

关 键 词:公诉证据标准  有罪判决证明标准  现实的定罪预期

Tight or Loose: Reconsideration of the Standards of the Prosecution Evidence
HU Zhi-fang. Tight or Loose: Reconsideration of the Standards of the Prosecution Evidence[J]. Academic Research, 2011, 0(4): 49-54
Authors:HU Zhi-fang
Affiliation:HU Zhi-fang(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,411105,Hunan,China)
Abstract:Shall the standard of the prosecution evidence be lower than the standard of proof of guilt or come in line with it? This is the argument over the tight or loose standards of the prosecution evidence. A proper understanding of the standards of the prosecution evidence is the premise of such a discussion. Although the legislation about the standard of the prosecution evidence in western countries may be of referential value to China, it should not be copied mechanically. A review of the argument over the tight or loose standards of the prosecution evidence and an analysis of the relevant discussions and practices suggest that Chi- na is expected to adhere to the conformity of the standard of prosecution evidence with the standard of proof of guilt. Meanwhile, considering the precision in expression, revisions are necessary in terms of Chinas standards of the prosecution evidence.
Keywords:the standard of prosecution evidence  the standard of proof of guilt  realistic prospect of conviction  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号