| 日汉自动词被动句对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李金莲. 日汉自动词被动句对比分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 0(4): 114-118 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李金莲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学外国语学院,山东济南,250100 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 山东省社会科学规划研究项目(11CWXJ14) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 无论在汉语中还是在日语中,由自动词充当谓语的被动句都是被动句在语用上的扩展,但二者在结构、语义和语用上都存在明显差异.汉语的自动词被动句,其实是用“被”字引进引发谓语动词所表状态或变化的原因的,主语是该状态或变化的主体.日语的自动词被动句,是用来表示主语因谓语动词所表动作行为等的发生,间接地遭受麻烦或不利的,主语是间接受事.
|
| 关 键 词： | 自动词被动句 语用扩展 对译语料库 |
A Contrastive Analysis of the Passive Sentences with Intransitive Verbs in Japanese and Chinese |
| |
| Li Jinlian. A Contrastive Analysis of the Passive Sentences with Intransitive Verbs in Japanese and Chinese[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2012, 0(4): 114-118 |
| |
| Authors: | Li Jinlian |
| |
| Affiliation: | Li Jinlian(School of Foreign Languages and Literature,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Whether it is in Chinese or Japanese language,passive sentences with intransitive verbs as the predicate can be considered as the extension of passive sentences in pragmatics,but both of them are quite different in structure,semantics and pragmatics.In Chinese passive sentences with intransitive verbs,the word "bei(被)" itself denotes the cause of the state or the change,and the subject is the direct recipient of such a state or change.While in Japanese language,passive sentences with intransitive verbs imply that the subject is the indirect recipient of the trouble or the adversity denoted by the predicate. |
| |
| Keywords: | passive sentences with intransitive verbs pragmatic extension translation corpus |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
