| 两大法系的民事诉讼证明标准之差异及其原因 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 娄正前.两大法系的民事诉讼证明标准之差异及其原因[J].江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004,4(3):7-12. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 娄正前 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 镇江市中级人民法院,研究室,江苏,镇江,212001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为进一步完善我国民事诉讼证明标准的立法 ,需要研究西方两大法系的相关法律。英美法系以盖然性占优势作为民事诉讼证明标准 ,而大陆法系则以较高程度盖然性作为标准 ,同时这两大法系又有各自的例外。造成这些差异的原因主要在于历史传统和理论基础方面
|
| 关 键 词： | 盖然性占优势 较高程度的盖然性 例外 差异的原因 建议 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-7082(2004)02-0007-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月15日 |
The Differences of Standard Proof in the Civil Proceedings in Common Law and Civil Law and Their Reasons |
| |
| LOU Zheng-qian.The Differences of Standard Proof in the Civil Proceedings in Common Law and Civil Law and Their Reasons[J].Jiangsu University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition,2004,4(3):7-12. |
| |
| Authors: | LOU Zheng-qian |
| |
| Abstract: | For the improvement of standard proof in the civil proceedings, we need to study the related law in common law and civil law.The criterion in the common law is preponderance of probability, but it is highly probable in the civil law, at the same time they have respective exception.The reasons that result in these differences primarily consist in the history traditions and the theories. |
| |
| Keywords: | preponderance of probability highly probable exception reasons of differences suggestion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
