| 庭审方式改革后的辩护权保障 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 任永安.庭审方式改革后的辩护权保障[J].湘潭大学学报,2010,34(1):36-38. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 任永安 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学,法学院,四川,成都,610064 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 英美法系当事人主义刑事庭审方式,在审判前、后需要一系列的配套制度和程序,否则,其维护程序正义、保障辩护权的基本功能就难以实现.我国1996年刑事诉讼法以及新律师法"断章取义"地吸纳了当事人主义刑事庭审方式的某些因素,而未能有全面的制度考察,致使其在保障辩护权上不能如愿以偿.在未来的刑事诉讼法修改时,我们应进一步吸收当事人主义刑事诉讼的令状原则,赋予辩护方各项诉讼权利,完善与对抗制庭审方式相配套的制度和程序,以切实保障辩护权的行使.
|
| 关 键 词： | 当事人主义 刑事庭审方式 辩护权 |
Research on Defense Right after the Reform of Criminal Justice Style |
| |
| REN Yong-an.Research on Defense Right after the Reform of Criminal Justice Style[J].Journal Of XIANGTAN University:Philosophy And Social Sciences,2010,34(1):36-38. |
| |
| Authors: | REN Yong-an |
| |
| Institution: | REN Yong-an (Faculty of Law,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610064,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Common Law adversary system of criminal justice style,in the trial,after the required number of supporting systems and procedures,otherwise,their maintenance procedures of justice,to protect the right of defense of the basic functions difficult to achieve.China's current Criminal Procedure law and New Law of the People's Republic of China on Lawyers,out of context,absorbing the adversary system of criminal justice style,the way certain factors,but not a comprehensive institutional arrangements,resulting in ... |
| |
| Keywords: | litigant pvinciple reform of justice stylec defense right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《湘潭大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《湘潭大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
