首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

是丁汝昌“避战保船”还是李鸿章“保船制敌”
引用本文:杨晓伟. 是丁汝昌“避战保船”还是李鸿章“保船制敌”[J]. 陇东学院学报(社会科学版), 2009, 0(4)
作者姓名:杨晓伟
作者单位:河北师范大学历史文化学院;
摘    要:从前某些学者一谈到黄海海战的失利,都笼统地归结于清朝统治者的腐朽,一谈到北洋舰队的覆灭就归结于李鸿章避战保舰。甲午中日海战中,李鸿章究竟为北洋舰队制定了什么样的作战方针?本文认为,甲午中日开战后的一个多月,李鸿章对比中日海军实力,从实际出发,制定了"保船制敌"的作战方针。综观甲午中日海战的全过程,李鸿章在海战的任何一个阶段都未指示过北洋舰队通过"避战"而"避战"。恰恰相反,李鸿章一再命令北洋舰队主动"出击"、"截击"敌舰队。即使在威海被围,北洋舰队危急存亡之际,李鸿章还数次命令丁汝昌率领舰队和敌舰队"拼死一战"。因此,"避战保船"的不是李鸿章,而是北洋舰队的提督丁汝昌。

关 键 词:避战保船  李鸿章  丁汝昌  北洋海军  

Whether it was the Policy of "Defending the Ships by Avoiding Battles" by Ding Ruchang or the Strategy of "Fighting Enemy Without Losing Fleet" by Li Hongzhang
YANG Xiao-wei. Whether it was the Policy of "Defending the Ships by Avoiding Battles" by Ding Ruchang or the Strategy of "Fighting Enemy Without Losing Fleet" by Li Hongzhang[J]. Journal of Longdong University(Social Science Edition), 2009, 0(4)
Authors:YANG Xiao-wei
Affiliation:College of Historical Culture;Hebei Normal University;Shijiazhuang 050091;Hebei
Abstract:As soon as certain former scholars talked about the unfavorable situation of the Yellow Sea Naval Battle,all generally would attributed it to the ruler's decayed in Qing Dynasty.And the entire destruction of Beiyang Fleet would be attributed to the policy of "defending the ships by avoiding battles" by Lihongzhang.What kind of strategy had been made actually by Li Hongzhang in the Sino-Japanese Naval Battle for Beiyang Fleet? This paper presents Li Hongzhang has made the strategy of "defending the ships by ...
Keywords:"  defending the ships by avoiding battles"    Li Hongzhang  Ding Ruchang  Beiyang Navy  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号