| 对我国先行调解制度的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 傅贤国,丛树德.对我国先行调解制度的思考[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):68-72. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 傅贤国 丛树德 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 贵州民族大学法学院,贵州贵阳,550025
2. 武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 准确界定我国《民诉法》第122条新增设的先行调解制度的概念和性质仍有必要。由于法律规定过于粗疏,先行调解制度存在诸多不足,如先行调解应遵循的原则、适用的案件范围、适用期限、组织调解的机构和人员、启动条件以及调解协议的效力认定等。为保证先行调解制度预设功能的实现,应对以上不足尽快一一予以完善。
|
| 关 键 词： | 先行调解 规范缺失 制度功能 完善建议 |
Thoughts on the First Mediation System |
| |
| FU Xiao-guo,CONG Shu-de.Thoughts on the First Mediation System[J].Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences),2014(6):68-72. |
| |
| Authors: | FU Xiao-guo CONG Shu-de |
| |
| Institution: | FU Xiao-guo CONG Shu-de (1. Law School of Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang 550025, China 2. Law School of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | It＇s still necessary to accurately define the concept and nature of first new mediation system established by China＇s ＂Civil Procedure Law＂ Article 122. Because the law is too deficient, first mediation system has many deficiencies, such as principle, the applicable scope, the application deadline, institutions and personnel organizing mediation, starting conditions and the effectiveness of the conciliation agreement decided. To ensure the first mediation system to achieve the preset function, inadequate response to one or more should be improved as soon as possible. |
| |
| Keywords: | first mediation specification missing system function perfect suggestion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
