论《政治经济学批判大纲》中的哲学分析框架问题（待续）

从20世纪60年代开始，马克思的《政治经济学批判大纲》成为国际学术界研究和争论的焦点。研究和争论展开于三个领域：文献学、政治经济学和哲学。就哲学领域的研究历史和现状说，人们涉及到了众多论题，劳动异化说，自由时间说，社会本体论说，黑格尔哲学痕迹说等，不一而足。相对于《政治经济学批判大纲》的思想实际而言，已有研究成果的不足之处明显可见：没有在自觉意识层面提出和探讨其中的哲学分析框架问题。这里的哲学分析框架是主体、客体及二者之间的辩证关系。马克思运用这一哲学分析框架透视资本主义生产运行的三个过程：为剩余价值生产做准备的流通过程，即货币资本与劳动能力相交换；剩余价值的生产过程，即人与自然界的物质变换；剩余价值的实现过程，即商品资本与货币相交换。结果令人叹为观止，资本主义生产的政治经济学本质、阶级本质、法权本质、人学本质和社会历史本质逐一被暴露于光天化日之下。总体看，《政治经济学批判大纲》具有无可替代的马克思主义文献学价值，对我们现有的学术研究范式提出了诸多挑战，回应这些挑战是我们的学术责任。

On the Framework of Philosophical Analysis of The Critique Outline of Political Economy(To be continued)

From the beginning of 1960s, Marxs The Critique Outline of Political Economy has become the focus of international academic research and debate. Research and debate are in three fields: literature, political economics and philosophy. On the research of history and current status of the field of philosophy people involve numerous topics, labor alienation, free time, social ontology refinement, traces of Hegels philosophy variously. Compared with the ideological practice of The Critique Outline of Political Economy, the shortcomings of the existing research results are obvious: it does not put forward and explore the philosophical analysis framework from the level of consciousness. The philosophical analysis framework is the dialectical relationship between the subject, the object and the two. Marx used the philosophical framework of analysis to examine three processes of capitalist production run: the circulation process for the production of surplus value, that is the exchange of monetary capital and labor ability; the production process of surplus value, namely the material transformation between man and nature; the realizing process of the surplus value, namely the exchange phase between commodity capital and monetary. The results show, capitalist political economy nature, class nature and legal nature, science nature and essence of social history one by one are exposed in broad daylight. Overall,The Critique Outline of Political Economy has an irreplaceable value of Maxism literature, which proposes many challenges for our existing academic research paradigm, and the response to these challenges is our academic responsibility.