“十七年文学”研究的三个误区

“十七年”是近年来文学研究领域的一个热门话题,已有不少论著先后问世。虽然其中不乏新见,但也存在仍然重复1980年代历史语境中产生的研究思路。只有真正摆脱把个人与集体、政治与文学、政治与人情人性二元对立的思维模式,加强文本细读与话语分析,十七年文学研究才能够真正深入。《上海的早晨》继承中国传统的神魔小说和世情小说的历史传统,以传统叙事模式讲述现代社会生活,是作品在大众化方面取得成就的重要原因之一。《金沙洲》初版本到修订本的修改痕迹,透露出不同思想、不同话语、不同语境在作家个体身上不断摩擦互动对话的历史症候,从而可以看出十七年时期思想、文化、精神、意识形态的动态位移过程。

Three Errors in the Studies of 17-Year Literature

iT-year literature is a hot topic in the field of literature in recent years, with many new works of research published. Although many of the works have new ideas, there is still a repetition of the 1980 research pattern arising in the historical context of the time. Only by coming out of the dualistic thinking mode concerning individual and collective, politics and literature, politics and humanity, and deepening the reading and discourse analysis of texts, can we really further our research of 17-year literature. Shanghai Morning inherits the tradition of Chinese genie novels and love stories and employs the traditional narrative methods in depicting China＇s modern social life, hence its popularity. Jinsha Shoal, from its first to revised editions, reveals how different ideas, discourse modes, and contexts interact on in- dividual writers and how thinking, culture, spirit and ideology changed during the 17-year period.