| 塔斯基把"己过"归罪于"语言"--评两个悖论之冠:"说谎者"、"亦此亦彼" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄展骥. 塔斯基把"己过"归罪于"语言"--评两个悖论之冠:"说谎者"、"亦此亦彼"[J]. 合肥学院学报(社会科学版), 2005, 22(4): 56-60 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄展骥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河池学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 塔斯基宣判"自然(日常)语言"死刑,是因为他发现它内含"矛盾被证".塔斯基误把自己犯的"矛盾定义"谬误"迁怒"、"归罪"于语言本身,所以塔斯基的"层级论"应被抛弃;哥德尔和塔斯基两者的理论"相通",自然也会受到质疑.
|
| 关 键 词： | 塔斯基 哥德尔 谬误 自然语言 矛盾被证 矛盾定义 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-920X(2005)04-0056-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-06-12 |
Tarski Attrubuting "His Own Mistake" to "Language"--"Liar Variant" Paradox Commits "Contradictory Definition" Fallacy |
| |
| HUANG Zhan-ji. Tarski Attrubuting "His Own Mistake" to "Language"--"Liar Variant" Paradox Commits "Contradictory Definition" Fallacy[J]. Journal of Hefei University(Social Sciences), 2005, 22(4): 56-60 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Zhan-ji |
| |
| Abstract: | Tarski condemns "natural language" into death,because he thinks that it consists of "contradiction proved".This essay points out: Tarski commits and attributes his own "contradictory definition" fallacy to "language" itself;therefore his "theory of types" should be discarded.Bcause of the inherent relation between Godel's theory and Tarski's,we may also show doubt about the former theory. |
| |
| Keywords: | A.Tarski K.Godel fallacy natural language contradiction proved contradictory definition |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
