| 依职权撤销违法负担行为的法律规制——以[2005]泸行终字第360号判决为研究对象 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石珍.依职权撤销违法负担行为的法律规制——以[2005]泸行终字第360号判决为研究对象[J].成都理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012(5):36-41. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石珍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆400031 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 西南政法大学2010年度研究生科研创新计划项目“给付行政模式下行政诉讼制度改革研究”的部分成果(2010XZYJS120) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 尽管负担行政行为所产生的法律后果对相对人而言颇为不利,但撤销负担行政行为亦存在损及私权利的可能性。故不得笼统地赋予行政机关撤销负担行政行为的自由裁量权。即便是撤销负担行政行为也应建立在正当考虑的基础之上,且正视相对人可能遭受的利益损害,平衡公共利益与私权利。
|
| 关 键 词： | 负担行政行为 行政行为撤销 实质法治 利益衡量 正当目的 |
The Legal Regulation on the Revocation of Illegal Burden Behaviors according to Legal Power: With the 360th Decision of the Final Appeal Court in Luzhou as the Research Object |
| |
| SHI Zhen.The Legal Regulation on the Revocation of Illegal Burden Behaviors according to Legal Power: With the 360th Decision of the Final Appeal Court in Luzhou as the Research Object[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences,2012(5):36-41. |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Zhen |
| |
| Institution: | SHI Zhen(Chief School of Law of Southwest University of Political Science,Chongqing 400031,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Although the legal consequences of the burden administrative behaviors are negative to the relatives,there still is a possible harm to the private rights if we revoke the burden administrative behaviors.Therefore we shouldn’t confer the executive authorities the discretion of revoking the burden administrative behaviors.Even though we have to revoke the burden administrative behaviors,we should also do it on the basis of proper consideration,face up the damage that the relatives may suffer,and balance the public interest and private rights. |
| |
| Keywords: | the burden administrative behaviors the revocation of administrative behaviors substance rule of law the measure of the interests legitimate purposes |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
