首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

英美司法审查制度之比较
引用本文:王锴. 英美司法审查制度之比较[J]. 延安大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 26(1): 50-54
作者姓名:王锴
作者单位:中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872
摘    要:由于历史的原因,英美两国的司法审查制度存在着千丝万缕的联系,但是,宪政制度的不同,却也造成了它们之间的差异。这种差异从两国司法审查的范围、程度、方法以及起诉资格的限制等方面就可以看出。然而,随着世界范围内对人权保障的逐步加深,两国的司法审查制度也呈现出相同的发展趋势,那就是建立一套范围更广、程度更深、方法更统一、限制更少的司法审查制度。

关 键 词:司法审查  普通法  宪政制度  司法审查的范围  司法审查的程度  司法审查的方法  起诉资格的限制
文章编号:1004-9975(2004)01-0050-05
修稿时间:2003-07-10

A Comparison between British and American Judicial Review Systems
WANG Kai. A Comparison between British and American Judicial Review Systems[J]. Journal of Yan'an University (Social Science Edition), 2004, 26(1): 50-54
Authors:WANG Kai
Abstract:Because of the history,there exists a close relation between British and American judicial review systems.However,the different constitutionalism institution divert them.The distinctness in two judicial review systems includes scope of judicial review and its intensity,method and limits on capacity to sue.But,with the idea of protecting human right improving in the whole world,British and American judicial review systems have a same trend to make scope larger,intensity stronger,method more uniform and limits on capacity to sue smaller.
Keywords:judicial review   common law   constitutionalism institution   scope of judicial review   intensity of judicial review   method of judicial review   limits on capacity to sue  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号