在政策与法理之间——美国溯及立法的界限 |
| |
引用本文: | 孙晓红.在政策与法理之间——美国溯及立法的界限[J].兰州学刊,2010(7):128-133. |
| |
作者姓名: | 孙晓红 |
| |
作者单位: | 山西财经大学,法学院,山西,太原,030006 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国特色社会主义根本民主政治理论与建设研究" |
| |
摘 要: | 美国最高法院通过判例形成了刑事法律以不溯及既往为原则、以溯及既往为例外的溯及许可界限;而民事法律的溯及许可的界限有较大的灵活性,原则上不受宪法第一条有关溯及立法规定的约束,总体上是以溯及既往为原则、不溯及既往为例外,受不同历史时期社会经济文化奈件的影响,最高法院在政策考量与法理权衡中决定着溯及立法许可的界限。
|
关 键 词: | 美国溯及立法 溯及许可界限 政策 法理 违宪审查 |
Between Policy and Jurisprudence——Comments on the Limits of Retroactive Legislation in America |
| |
Authors: | Sun Xiaohong |
| |
Institution: | Sun Xiaohong |
| |
Abstract: | The United States Supreme Court has established the limits of criminal retroactive legislation by judicial precedents: non - retroactivity is a general principle with retroactivity as an exception. However, the limits of retroactivity are the opposite on civil legislation with much flexibility and are non - binding in principle by Art. 1 of the Constitution pertaining to retroactive legislation. Influenced by diverse economic and cultural conditions in different periods, the Supreme Court makes decisions on retroactive limits between policy and jurisprudence. |
| |
Keywords: | retroactive legislation limits of retroactive legislation policy jurisprudence judicial review |
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|