亚里士多德与墨子政治哲学比较研究

从政治哲学角度考察,亚里士多德认为政治权力源于人性中的自然和伦理本性及其逻辑展开,墨子则把天作为权力的合法源头;亚氏把权力性善作为其合法性基础,墨子则认为权力的本质应当是服务;虽然他们都强调公共权力应优先分配给优秀者,但亚氏优秀的标准是忠诚和才干,而墨子则认为是爱人和服从。

A Comparative Research in the Political Philosophy Between Aristotles and Moze

There were many differences in politics between Aristotles and Moze from the view of political philosophy. Aristotles said that the political power originated from the natural and ethical essence in human nature and its logic development. Moze took it as Heaven; Aristotles considered the nature of power was goodness, Moze took it ought to serve the people; Both of them agreed to distribute the political power to the excellent men, Aristotles took the standards of excellence was royal and talent, but Moze took it as love (people) and obey (authority).