《左传》成书战国说综考

啖助认为《左待》成于后代学者之手。赵匡则明确提出“左氏非丘明”。否定了左丘明作传说。两宋承啖、赵绪余。议论蜂起。《左传》成书战国说更趋流行,代表人物是叶梦得、郑樵和万见春。元明两代继续做了一些探索。入清以后,虽然康熙御定左丘明作传说。但战国说仍然得到一些学者的中持。民国以后,战国说以其理据逐渐占据了学界的主导地位。其论证的方法手段都有不少新拓展,并通过各自的研究。得出了同属战国说而具体年代与作者互有歧异的种种结论。

Zuo Zhuan Was Completed During Warring States Period

Dan Zhu took the view that Zuo Zhuan was completed by scholars in later ages.Zhao Kuang put forward definitely " The one surnamed Zuo was not Zuo Qiuming",negating the assertion that the book was compiled by the latter.In the two Song Dynasties opinions succeeding to Dan's and Zhao's rose like bees in swarms.The proposition that Zuo Zhuan was completed during the period of Warring States prevailed,with Ye Mengde,Zheng Qiao and Wan Jianchun as the representatives.Further investigations were conducted in the Yuan and the Qing Dynasties.Then despite Kangxi's royal decision that Zuo Qiuming was the author.Some scholars still stood on the side of the Warring States proposition,which gradually became dominant in educational circles after the 1911 revolution.New and extended methods and ways of demonstrations were not just a few.Conclusions were reached on the period of Warring States,still some differences existed as to the years and the writers.