| 《金瓶梅》评论中的作品比较现象刍议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张进德,;李娟娟.《金瓶梅》评论中的作品比较现象刍议[J].焦作工学院学报(社会科学版),2014(2):189-193. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张进德 ;李娟娟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]河南大学文学院,河南开封475001; [2]河南大学国学研究所,河南开封475001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2012年度河南省哲学社会科学规划项目（2012BWX022）. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《金瓶梅》在中国小说史上占居重要地位，众多评论者从各种角度以各种方式给予全方位的解读。在评论中存在着大量将其与其他各类作品作比较的现象，其范围涉及诗赋、史传、戏曲以及小说等等，通过比较论述论者表达了自己对《金瓶梅》的阅读体验及价值评判。这些对比论述不乏中肯的评价，但也存在溢美或贬抑等有失客观的情况。本文以此为切入点，探究前人对于《金瓶梅》的审美感悟，以期对《金瓶梅》的丰富蕴涵与文学地位有更加深刻全面的把握。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《金瓶梅》 评论 比较 地位 |
On the Comparative Study in Reviews of The Golden Lotus |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Jin-de, LI Juan-juan ( 1. College of Chinese Language and Literature, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; 2. Research Institute of Sinology Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Golden Lotus is one of the most important works in Chinese novel history, thus has appealed to a great many critics to interpret it from various angles. In those reviews, The Golden Lotus is compared with other works in most cases, which ranges from poem, historical biography, traditional Chinese opera and novel. Critics express their reading experience and value judgment in their reviews, pertinent though many are, biased opinions do exist. This paper studies previous critics＇ aesthetic appreciation of The Golden Lotus from the perspective of comparative study, which will shed some light on its rich implication and literary status. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Golden Lotus review comparison status |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
