评价理论视阈中《庄子》寓言与《伊索寓言》角色形象对比研究

《庄子》寓言和《伊索寓言》是中西方寓言文学的杰出代表。两部寓言均未使用概念、判断和推理等逻辑思维方式来论证说理，而是诉诸形象、故事等来阐释丰富、深刻的哲学思想和经验教训。试图以马丁等人的评价理论为指导，以《庄子》寓言和《伊索寓言》为文本语料，对比探讨两部寓言作品中动植物和非生物形象的评价意义及其实现评价功能语言资源的异同和理据，领悟庄子和伊索对现实社会人与事的态度评价，从而启迪人类思想和人生智慧。

A Comparative Study on the Role Images of Chuang-tzu Fables and Aesop Fables from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory

Chuang-tzu Fables and Aesop Fables are outstanding representative works of Chinese and Western fable literature. Two works don＇t use ways of logic thinking such as concept, judgment and reasoning to argue and persuade, but resorting to images and stories to illustrate the rich and profound philosophical ideas and moral lessons. The paper, based on Martin＇s appraisal theory as guidance and Chuang-tzu Fables and Aesop Fables as text corpus, will probe into the evaluative meaning of the images of animals, plants and non-living things and language resources realizing the evaluative function. By contrasting, people can comprehend Chuang-tzu and Aesop＇s attitude towards the real world so as to enlighten human thought and life wisdom.