首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

海德格尔身体化生存的积极意义及其局限性——以马塞尔的具身化存在为参照
引用本文:刘丽霞,张颖.海德格尔身体化生存的积极意义及其局限性——以马塞尔的具身化存在为参照[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):147-152.
作者姓名:刘丽霞  张颖
作者单位:重庆理工大学 马克思主义学院,重庆,400054 上海体育学院 思想政治理论教学科研部,上海,200438
摘    要:《存在与时间》中"身体"的意义至少在三个不同的维度上呈现:(一)近代认识论范式下作为现成存在的感性身体,这是海德格尔所批判的.(二)专注沉浸于此在之日常生存实践的身体,海德格尔用身体化来命名,以区别于作为现成存在的感性身体.正如认识奠基于此在生存,从而只是生存之静止的专题化片刻,身体化生存亦是感性身体经验认知的根基.(三)此在本真生存维度即向死而生意义上的去身化.与海德格尔在日常生存层次上强调身体而在本真存在层次上祛除身体相反,马塞尔强调本真存在恰恰是借由我的具身化实现的,存在就是意识到我是被我自己的身体具身化的、个体的我.

关 键 词:感性身体  身体化  我的身体作为我的  perceptual-body  bodying  forth  my  body  qua  mine

The positive significance and limitation of Heidegger's bodying forth:By reference to Gabriel Marcel's being-embodiment
Authors:LIU Lixia  ZHANG Ying
Abstract:About the meanings of the body,there are three different levels in Being and Time.The first is the perceptual-body as present-at-hand in the modern epistemology,that is the target of Heidegger's ontological critique.The second is bodying forth,that is absorbed in the existing activity of Dasein.The bodying forth underlines the perceptual-body,just as knowing bases on existence and is thematised as one static moment of existence.The third is the bodiless of the authentic self in the Being-toward-death as Dasein's own most potentiality-for-Being.In contrast to Heidegger,Gabriel Marcel believes that only through my embodiment can the authentic and individualized being realized,and being means to realize that I am myself embodied by my own body.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号