虚假陈述证券民事赔偿中的前置程序问题

从立法目的层面来理解,虚假陈述证券民事赔偿中的前置程序对于保证人民法院提高审判质量有积极意义,但对保障投资者诉权却是有利有弊.从发挥民事责任追究的功能、增强法官专业知识和审判经验,以及前置程序与民事赔偿优先原则和刑事附带民事诉讼的关系等方面来看,虚假陈述证券民事赔偿中的前置程序是在我国目前立法与司法环境尚待完善的情况下才有的权宜之计,长远来看应该取消.

On preposifive procedure in securities civil compensation from misrepresentation

From the viewpoint of legislation, the prepositive procedure in securities civil suit resulting from misrepresentation is positively important for the people's courts to ensure the quality of their judicial decisions. While on the other hand, it is also a "double-bladed sword" in guaranteeing the investors' procedural rights. Examining from the following aspects as the realization of the function of civil liability, the enrichment of the judges' professional knowledge and judicial experiences, the relation between prepositive procedure and preference principle of civil compensation and civil suit attaching criminal prosecution, the prepositive procedure is only "relatively reasonable" under the legislative and judicial circumstances of China now, it should be abolished ultimately in the long run.