首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

宋本《伤寒论》中“相搏”为“相Bao”之讹误考
引用本文:王大妹. 宋本《伤寒论》中“相搏”为“相Bao”之讹误考[J]. 南京中医药大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 2(4): 190-192
作者姓名:王大妹
作者单位:南京中医药大学图书馆,江苏,南京,210029
摘    要:从现存《伤寒论》早期传本以及历代治仲景学之名家对“相搏”的注解等方面 ,对“相搏”为“相”之讹误进行了考证 ,同时亦对其产生的原因作了相关分析。指出现行《伤寒论》诸本中之“相搏”多为“相”之讹误。建议中医学术界对此进行深入的研究考证。同时希望日后再版《伤寒论》及其各种注释本时 ,对各版本中之“相”的处理持审慎态度

关 键 词:伤寒论  相搏  相  考证
文章编号:1009-3222(2001)04-0190-03
修稿时间:2001-11-02

Textual Research on "Xiang Bo", a Misnomer from Treatise on Febrile Disease
WANG Da-mei. Textual Research on "Xiang Bo", a Misnomer from Treatise on Febrile Disease[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science), 2001, 2(4): 190-192
Authors:WANG Da-mei
Abstract:With careful textual research, the author points out the misnomer "xiang bo", which was mistakenly taken from a similar term in Treatise on Febrile Disease . The authors call for further textual on this and suggests that compilers of new translation versions of Treatise on Febrile Disease be cautious in dealing with the medical term "xiang bo.
Keywords:Treatise on Febrile Disease  Xiang bo  textual research  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号