论前人对庄子"逍遥"的不同阐释

在《庄子》内七篇中 ,《逍遥游》是极为重要的一篇。但前人对庄子《逍遥游》意旨的理解 ,存在着很大的差异。大致可分为三类 ,一是用玄学“各适其性”之思想解释 ;二是用佛、老的“空无”思想理解 ;其三是用儒家思想解释 ,认为体现了“自在快适”的人生境界。这些解释表现了前人对庄子“逍遥”的理解以及与庄子本意的差别。这种差别的产生 ,一是由庄子独特的表达思想的方式和在庄子思想中存在的理想性和现实性的矛盾造成的 ;二是因为解释主体所处时代及主体因素的不同 ,导致了前人对庄子“逍遥”理解的差异。所以 ,比较前人对庄子“逍遥”的不同理解 ,可以从一个侧面了解古代思想的发展及存在的状态

Of the Different Interpretation to the Idea of "Xiaoyao (calm and master of oneself)" in Zhuang Zi's Xiaoyao You (An Account of a Carefree Journey) Given by Former Scholars

The most important work extant of Zhuang Zi's is Xiaoyao You (An Account of a Carefree Journey). (2) The former scholars interpretations on Xiaoyao (calm and master of oneself) in Zhuangzi were of three sorts: a, Xuanxueist "act to each natural instincts" (here the term Xuanxue denoting a learning appeared in the Wei Jin period based on Lao Zhuang philosophy mixing together with Confucian scholarship); b, Buddhist void and Taoist nihility; c, Confucianist " free in comfortable fitness". (3) There will be a disparity in the interpretation of the connotation of Xiaoyao given by the former scholars, and a disparity between these interpretations and the real intention of Xiaoyao which Zhuang Zi gives in his Xiaoyao You. The disparities should have resulted from the unique expression of thought Zhuang Zi presents in his work and the inclusive contradiction between ideality and reality in Zhuang Zi's thought, and, additionally, as the scholars were of different time and of different intuition, they reached different interpretations on Zhang Zi's Xiaoyao to each other were indispendable. (4) A comparative study of the former scholars' interpretations on Zhuang Zi's Xiaoyao will help to understand the development of the ancient Chinese thought.