论物权请求权的诉讼时效——立足于物权请求权的独立性

物权请求权发轫于罗马法的诉权,以对物之诉和对人之诉存在于罗马法。在部门法运动和中世纪法学理论的推动下,物权请求权分立于罗马诉权。尽管物权请求权承继罗马诉权的程序功能,且得诉权之行使方可实现,然而是物权请求权独立于诉权,发展为横跨实体权利与诉讼程序之间的桥梁,为物权的顺利实现提供服务和保障。但物权请求权不附属于物权,也非物权的效力所致,它是一种相对独立于物权的请求权,在物权存续期间,于一物的同一类型的物权请求权因同质的侵害行为会反复出现,但基于物权请求权的相对性和相对人的变化,此时的物权请求权与彼时的物权请求权并非同质。正是基于物权请求权的独立性,物权请求权才可能成为诉讼时效的客体。

On the Limitation of Legal Proceedings of the Claim of Real Right——Based on the Independence of the Claim of Real Right

Theclaim of real right originated from the just claim in Roman law,and existed as the claim for something and persons in Roman law.Under the drive of the movement of section law and the medieval law theory,the claim of the real right was separated from the just claim in Roman law.Although the claim of real right succeeds to its procedure function and is implemented with the help of legal proceedings,the claim of real right is independent of the just claim and has become a bridge connecting the substantial law with litigation procedure,and thus guaranteeing the smooth implementation of real right.However,the claim of the real right is not attached to the real right.neither is caused by the effectiveness of the real right.Actually,it is the claim independent of the real right.During the existence of the real right,the same type of the claim of the real right to something can appear repeatedly because of the homogeneous encroachments.Nevertheless,because of the relativity of claim of the real right and changes of relative people,the claim of real right now and that in the past are not homogeneous.Only with such the independence of claim of the real right,can it become the object of the limitation of legal proceeding