批判理性主义法哲学：阿尔伯特的理论路向与方法研究

在阿尔伯特看来,真理是那些能经受得起理性批判并能被事实证明了的东西。依这种真理观,在法律实践中人们首先应当将规范视为事实;其次,应当以理性为基础设置一些检验标准(他称之为“履行特性”或“目标设置”),人们根据自己的环境并辅助以理性来在规范或法律方案之间进行批判地选择。只有这样,法律的存在才是理性的,法学的存在才是科学的。最后,针对行为主义以及社会学等批判,阿尔伯特提出了自己的反驳。从这些批判和反驳中我们既能认识到批判理性主义存在的不足,也可以看到它对我们一般认识法律在理论上和方法论上的帮助。

The Legal Philosophy of Critical Rationalism: Albert's Opinions and Method

From the view of Albert,the truth means the things that can be criticized rationally and can be verified by facts.According to this view,first,norm should be taken as facts in legal practice.Second,people should set some examining standards based on ration(he calls them as "performance characteristic" or "goal-setting"),and people make their choices between norm and legal planning based on their background and ration.Thus,the existence of law is rational,and the science of law is scientific,At last,faced with the critiques from the sociological and behavioral,Albert,gives his gainsay.We can.find not only the defeat of Critical Rationalism but also the help it gives us in understanding law.