| 新刑事诉讼法专家辅助人制度的立法缺陷及其完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宫雪.新刑事诉讼法专家辅助人制度的立法缺陷及其完善[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2014(2):92-98. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宫雪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学研究生教育院,上海200042 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所资助项目（GY2014Z-5）;上海地方高校大文科学术新人培育计划资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 专家辅助人制度在新刑事诉法中的确立无疑将有助于推动鉴定人出庭作证效果的实现,确保鉴定意见的真实性和法官对鉴定意见的正确认定.在此之前,民诉法的有关规定和司法实践的积极探索也为刑事诉讼中专家辅助人制度的完善提供了有效参考.但目前我国有关专家辅助人制度的规定,无论是新刑诉法还是司法运作中依然存在缺陷,包括专家辅助人资格不明确、诉讼地位不确定、权利义务和出庭程序欠缺等.这些都亟需通过立法予以进一步完善,以确保专家辅助人制度能够发挥其应有的作用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事诉讼法 专家辅助人 鉴定意见 司法鉴定管理 鉴定程序 司法鉴定制度 |
Defects and pefection of the experts auxiliary systemof the new Criminal Procedural Law |
| |
| GONG Xue.Defects and pefection of the experts auxiliary systemof the new Criminal Procedural Law[J].Journal of Central South Huiversity: Social Science,2014(2):92-98. |
| |
| Authors: | GONG Xue |
| |
| Institution: | GONG Xue( Graduate School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Because of the scientific and professional characteristics, the expert opinion has been becoming more andmore important in the system of evidence, and gradually replaces the confession. However, the prosecution, the defenseand the judges don’t have the expertise. Therefore, it is necessary to engage other people with the expertise to help theparties to solve the problems. The new Criminal Procedural Law was able to confirm that, but it is still flawed and mustbe urgently improved. |
| |
| Keywords: | Criminal Procedural Law expert auxiliary expert opinion management of expert testimony procedure ofexpert testimony expert testimony system |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
