A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility,Best Practices,and Theory‐Building |
| |
Authors: | Michael C. Frank Elika Bergelson Christina Bergmann Alejandrina Cristia Caroline Floccia Judit Gervain J. Kiley Hamlin Erin E. Hannon Melissa Kline Claartje Levelt Casey Lew‐Williams Thierry Nazzi Robin Panneton Hugh Rabagliati Melanie Soderstrom Jessica Sullivan Sandra Waxman Daniel Yurovsky |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Stanford University;2. Duke University;3. Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), Ecole Normale SuperieurePSL Research University;4. University of Plymouth;5. CNRS & Université Paris Descartes;6. University of British Columbia;7. University of Nevada, Las Vegas;8. Harvard University;9. Leiden University;10. Princeton University;11. Virginia Tech;12. University of Edinburgh;13. University of Manitoba;14. Skidmore College;15. Northwestern University;16. University of Chicago |
| |
Abstract: | The ideal of scientific progress is that we accumulate measurements and integrate these into theory, but recent discussion of replicability issues has cast doubt on whether psychological research conforms to this model. Developmental research—especially with infant participants—also has discipline‐specific replicability challenges, including small samples and limited measurement methods. Inspired by collaborative replication efforts in cognitive and social psychology, we describe a proposal for assessing and promoting replicability in infancy research: large‐scale, multi‐laboratory replication efforts aiming for a more precise understanding of key developmental phenomena. The ManyBabies project, our instantiation of this proposal, will not only help us estimate how robust and replicable these phenomena are, but also gain new theoretical insights into how they vary across ages, linguistic communities, and measurement methods. This project has the potential for a variety of positive outcomes, including less‐biased estimates of theoretically important effects, estimates of variability that can be used for later study planning, and a series of best‐practices blueprints for future infancy research. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|