| 《三国演义》的史家立场与演义趣味 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 鲁 小 俊. 《三国演义》的史家立场与演义趣味[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 13(1): 107-109 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 鲁 小 俊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学文学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 前人在《三国演义》＂虚＂与＂实＂的问题上纠缠不清,一个重要原因在于对史书之＂真＂或史家之＂求真＂的认识不全面。论者往往过于强调史家笔下的历史的＂事实＂面,而忽略它还有＂意义＂面。《三国演义》的＂事实＂之外有＂意义＂,甚至是春秋笔法、微言大义,这便是演义的趣味,它与史家的立场一脉相承。并且演义的＂意义＂较之于史书的＂意义＂,其哲学意蕴更为深远。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《三国演义》 史家立场 演义趣味 |
| 收稿时间： | 2010-06-17 |
Historian perspective and fictionalization in Romance of the Three Kingdoms |
| |
| Lu Xiaojun. Historian perspective and fictionalization in Romance of the Three Kingdoms[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 2011, 13(1): 107-109 |
| |
| Authors: | Lu Xiaojun |
| |
| Affiliation: | Lu Xiaojun(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The dispute over fiction versus historical facts in Romance of the Three Kingdoms has never been dispelled.Such disagreement is partly caused by the misunderstanding of the concept of truth in historical records or the truth pursuing endeavors on the part of the historian.The facts aspect of the history by the historian tends to be overemphasized,while the significance of presenting historical facts is often ignored.The facts in Romance of the Three Kingdoms carry with them additional significance or deep m... |
| |
| Keywords: | Romance of the Three Kingdoms historian perspective fictionalization |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
