| 刑事诉讼中的交涉-说理机制 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石浩旭. 刑事诉讼中的交涉-说理机制[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 3(3): 284-288 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石浩旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 江西九江学院 政法学院， 江西 九江 332005； 2. 中南财经政法大学 法学院， 武汉 430074 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2010年中国法学会部级法学研究课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 受职权主义惯性思维的影响，刑事诉讼中对抗制所具有的交涉-说理机制被忽视。交涉-说理机制的本质是公民权利制约国家权力，市民社会为其力量源泉，建构理论为其认识论基础。探讨这一机制的理论基础，明确其本质及必要性，并探索其制度实践途径，有利于诉讼观念的转变和制度的构建，在诉讼法修改过程中具有重要的现实意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事诉讼 交涉-说理机制 职权主义 公民权利 国家权力 市民社会 建构理论 诉讼观念 |
On exchange and persuasion mechanism in criminal lawsuits |
| |
| SHI Hao-xu. On exchange and persuasion mechanism in criminal lawsuits[J]. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2010, 3(3): 284-288 |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Hao-xu |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Law and Politics, Jiangxi Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China; 2. School of Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430074, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Influenced by the inertia of inquisitorial thoughts,the exchange and persuasion mechanism of adversary system in criminal lawsuit is neglected. The essence of exchange and persuasion mechanism is civic right restricting state power. The civic society is the source of power of this mechanism,and the constructivism theory is the epistemological basis of it. It benefits the litigating concept transformation and institutional construction to discuss the theoretical basis,to define the essence and necessity,and to probe the institutional practice approaches of the exchange and persuasion mechanism. The discussion has important practical significance in the process of the modification of procedural laws. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal lawsuit exchange and persuasion mechanism inquisitorialness civic right state power civic society constructivism theory litigating concept |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
