语境论的修正及其对怀疑论难题的解决

认识的语境论在回应怀疑论难题的过程中,出现了多种修正的形式,包括以相对标准修正的语境论,以事实作为原因修正的语境论,以妥协方式修正的语境论,以证据修正的语境论,以预设修正的语境论。这些不同形式的语境论遇到了"斑马悖论"和摩尔主义的反驳,但语境论者认为这两个反驳不一定有效,正是它们忽视了语境的作用,才导致悖论的出现,要解决怀疑论难题,还得回到特定语境中去。

Amendment of Contextualism and Its Solutions to Skeptical Paradox

Many amendatory forms of epistemic contextualism have been emerged in the course of solving skeptical paradox.As the author named,they are relative criterion contextualism,fact-as-cause contextualism,transigent contextualism,evidential contextualism and presuppositional contextualism,which come into the objections of zebra paradox and Mooreanism.But Contextualists argue that the two objections are not efficiency,because they ignore the role of context.If we want to solve skeptical paradox,we should come back to contextualism.