Very Brief Interventions in College Mental Health

Abstract

Although short encounters account for one-half of college mental health practice, they're often viewed as an unavoidable evil rather than a desired outcome. In order to evaluate client satisfaction with very brief interventions the authors mailed questionaires to 215 clients who had mental health encounters lasting no more than three sessions. Seventy-two percent of respondents were satisfied with their treatment. Thirty-six percent reported that they terminated because they felt they satisfied the conditions of the consultation, as opposed to 16% who left dissatisfied and 29% who left because they were referred elsewhere. A chart review revealed that in 45% of cases the decision to terminate was made unilaterally by the client. These findings suggest that very brief interventions are more often associated with rapid goal achievement than with client dissatisfaction.