形而下呓语——从欧美文学看文体学的客观解释力

文体学被认为是解读文学文本的利器,然而在20世纪语言学转向后的解构主义时代,文体学所倡导的"客观解读"原则是否可行值得怀疑。同时,文体学自身多次转移立足点,最终将注意力集中在历史、文化的维度上,与文体学得以独立存在的基本研究出发点产生本体性矛盾。基于上述考虑,批评者能否通过对文体学所涉及的基本概念进行归纳,用揭示矛盾的逻辑手段,常识性地指出文体学所自称的"客观的解释力"及文体学作为独立学科的地位都是有待讨论的。

Sub-physics Fantasy：A Revaluation of Stylistics Obj ective Interpretation

Stylistics is traditionally taken as a guidance for literary interpretation.However,after the rising of Deconstructionism as the turning point for linguistics development,it naturally became unauthen-tic if we consider the so called principle of “obj ective interpretation”with such background.On the other hand,stylistics changes its focus consistently,because of the historical and cultural dimensional transmis-sion,there is an unavoidable ontological paradox in relevance with the stylistic domain.Throughout the exploration of such illogical flaw within the methodology,this paper tries to reveal that“the obj ective eval-uation”is doubtable and the independency of stylistics should be evaluated in the future.