首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

比较教育学实证主义和相对主义分析框架的比较及启示
作者姓名:张刘龙  曹能秀
作者单位:(云南师范大学教育科学与管理学院,云南昆明 650500),(云南师范大学教育科学与管理学院,云南昆明 650500)
摘    要:理论分析框架的整合不仅是比较教育学理论发展的基础路径,也是当代比较教育研究不断完善自身体系的价值追求。比较教育研究中的两大理论分析框架——实证主义和相对主义,前者强调运用科学实证的研究方法概括出整个教育系统的一般普遍规律,后者侧重采用本土化的研究方法为特定教育对象的发展提供决策服务。二者的比较加强了比较教育学的理论与实践的结合,有利于建立包容、系统的理论分析框架,并不断促进比较教育研究体系的整合。

关 键 词:比较教育学  实证主义  相对主义    分析框架    启示
收稿时间:2017/4/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/7/5 0:00:00

Comparison and Enlightenment of Comparative and Analytical Framework of Positivism and Relativism
Authors:ZHANG Liu-long and CAO Neng-xiu
Abstract:The integration of theoretical analysis framework is not only the basic path of the development of comparative education theory, but also the value pursuit of contemporary comparative education research. The two main theoretical frameworks of comparative education research - positivism and relativism, the former emphasizes the use of scientific and empirical research methods to summarize the general law of the whole education system; the latter focuses on the use of localized research methods for specific educational objects development to provide decision-making services. The comparison between the two strengthens the combination of theory and practice of comparative education, establishes the framework of theoretical analysis of inclusive and systematic, and continuously promotes the integration of comparative education research system.
Keywords:comparative education  positivism  relativism  analytical framework  enlightenment
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号