首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

再论我国大学英语教学发展方向:通用英语和学术英语
引用本文:蔡基刚. 再论我国大学英语教学发展方向:通用英语和学术英语[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015, 1(4): 83-93
作者姓名:蔡基刚
摘    要:即将公布的《大学英语教学指南》把学术英语纳入大学英语教学内容中,而《上海市大学英语教学参考框架(试行)》更是提出学术英语核心课程的定位,要求在新生中普遍开展学习。这个新的定位在外语界引起很大的争议,争议很大程度上是对学术英语的误解造成的。学术英语和通用英语的区别不是难度而是目的:前者是基于专业需求驱动的,后者是基于语言学习驱动的。面对经济全球化和高等教育国际化,高校只有走国际化道路,才能培养在专业/行业领域内具有学术竞争力的国际化人才。因此,为了满足学科专业的国际化建设需求,大学英语必须调整定位,教学目的不应再是单纯学习语言或提高人文素质,而必须转向为专业服务,培养学生用英语从事专业学习和研究的学术能力。学术英语培养的不仅是学术英语技能,更重要的是以批判性思维能力为核心的学术素养,这是通识教育在语言教学中的使命。因此,不管学生专业课的教学语言是英语还是汉语,不管学生是研究型大学还是高职高专的,不管其毕业后是从事学术研究还是企业工作,学术英语应是每个大学生的必修课程。


The Orientation of College English Teaching Revisited: EGP and ESP
Cai Jigang. The Orientation of College English Teaching Revisited: EGP and ESP[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2015, 1(4): 83-93
Authors:Cai Jigang
Abstract:Guidelines for College English Teaching—a national syllabus to be issued by the Ministry of Education for the first time integrates EAP(English for Academic Purposes)into the content of college English teaching. A Framework of Reference for EFL Teaching at Tertiary Level in Shanghai goes even further, stipulating that EAP is the required course for all freshmen in Shanghai. This new orientation of college English teaching has triggered a heated debate in the foreign language field in mainland China,partly because of a general misunderstanding of EAP. EAP differs from EGP (English for general Purposes) which is now widely implemented at tertiary institutions in that the former is needs-driven,i.e. to fulfill the needs of students’ academic studies while the latter is language-learning driven.  College English, a compulsory course for all undergraduates, has been oriented to the improvement of their English proficiency (and the scores of College English Tests on most campuses) as well as their understanding of western culture since 1980. Faced with the economic globalization and the internationalization of higher education,however, college English needs to reorient itself. If a university wants to meet the challenge to cultivate their students with international competitive competence in their disciplines,they must go global which means offering many courses in English medium instruction (EMI) and requiring students of engaging in their academic studies in English. To be tailored to the emerging needs of disciplines,college English teaching should depart from the traditional teaching content and curricular which have followed the English major, transforming from helping students to simply lay English foundation to developing their capacity to apply English in their disciplinary studies. EAP plays a role of bridging the gap between EGP and EMI. It is a language course which differs from SBE (subject-based English) and EMI. The latter aim to impart disciplinary knowledge and are usually taught by specialists (subject teachers). EAP focuses the academic language skills,which are either transferable across disciplines or are appropriate to a particular discipline. By equipping students with such language skills as listening to lectures,read literature, write abstracts and papers, and attend academic discussion and conferences,EAP courses will guarantee students’success in their academic studies. Most importantly, EAP also nurtures their academic literacy such as the ability of independent study, critical thinking, creativity, communication and cross-culture. This forms a critical part of liberal education. For this reason,EAP should be a required course for undergraduates both of prestigious universities and of vocational colleges, even if their disciplinary courses are not EMI (English medium instruction) and students will not use English in their future careers.  Students’ needs should be guided. Their needs of learning English should not be met without rational analysis. Higher institutions,unlike the training centers of foreign languages, may steer students’ personal needs to the needs of the national foreign language capacity. The criteria for the success in English learning in modern times are neither the strength of their grammatical knowledge, nor the beauty of their spoken English even nor the high scores of their English tests. They are still a failure if they can’t read English literature in their disciplines, nor can communicate with their international counterparts. College English teaching is still a failure if those skills are not taught.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号