首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“崇高”与“雄浑”比较论
引用本文:钱超英.“崇高”与“雄浑”比较论[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1997(3).
作者姓名:钱超英
摘    要:本文从中西文学和文论比较研究的角度,探讨中国传统文论的有关可选概念与西方传统的“崇高”范畴相比较的适切性问题,并强调“雄浑”在中国文论中的重要意义。同时,作者也借此提示这种比较的意义:它作为更大范围的比较研究的切入点,有助于深入理解中西文化总体语境的异同。

关 键 词:比较文学,美学,文艺理论,崇高,雄浑,文化研究

A Comparison between the "Sublime" and the "Vigorous
Qian Chaoying.A Comparison between the "Sublime" and the "Vigorous[J].Journal of Shenzhen University(Humanities & Social Sciences),1997(3).
Authors:Qian Chaoying
Institution:Qian Chaoying
Abstract:In the perspective of the comparative research of the Eastern and Western literature and literary criticisms, this paper inquires into the appropriateness of comparing the concept of the"sublime" in the tradition of the West with the selectable concepts in the Chinese traditional literary criticisms and then dwells on the important position that the "vigorous"(Xionghun) concept holds in the Chinese literary criticism. Furthermore, the present study comes up with the significance of this comparison: it facilitates a deeper understanding of the similarities and differences of overall contexts of Chinese and Western cultures as a contact point of comparative researches to be conducted at a larger scale and in a wider scope.
Keywords:comparative literature  aesthetics  theory of literature and art  the sublime  the vigorous(Xionghun)  cultural research
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号