大湾区立法进路下的法理学思辨与定位

大湾区的法制建设是实现其区域经济和金融发展目标的重要保障,立法活动的顺利进行不能脱离坚实的法理基础。中国大湾区的法制建设环境面临着整合式的经济发展背景,而粤港澳大湾区所属的法域地区还呈现出多维化态势。面对"纲领式立法论与详尽式立法论"顶层式立法论与平行式立法论"和"回应式立法论与程序式立法论"三组法理争辩,中国在对大湾区进行相应立法活动时应采用比较研究法：首先充分分析并借鉴域外湾区的立法理论及其所形成的湾区立法模式,而后得出"我国大湾区范围内法律法规的制定应以纲领式立法论和回应式立法论为支撑,并将其作为规范出台的重要理论依据"这一结论。同时,在粤港澳大湾区内要采纳平行式立法论以尊重港澳两地所享有的高度自治权,在浙江大湾区内要发挥顶层立法理论的优势制定统一的规范性文件。

Analysis and selection of the legal theory of the legislation within the great bay area

The legal construction of the great bay area is a guarantee of realizing the economic and financial development goals within this area and the process of legislation could not be broken away from the solid analysis of the legal theory. China''s great bay areas are now facing the integrated economic background with the multiple scope of law in the Guangdong-HK-Macao Great Bay Area. When facing with the theoretical debates from different scholars, which are "programmatic legislative theory vs. detailed legislative theory", "top-level legislative theory vs. paralleled legislative theory" and "responsive legislative theory vs. procedural legislative theory", China should use comparative study and fully analyze the legal construction experiences in the bay area from different states before going on the legislative activity. China''s great bay areas should adopt the programmatic legislative theory and the responsive legislative theory. Meanwhile, the Guangdong-HK-Macao Great Bay Area should adopt the paralleled legislative theory as a respect to the high degree of autonomy of HK and Macao, and the Zhejiang Great Bay Area is good to use the top-level legislative theory to formulate a uniform legislation.