首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国共同侵权制度的再探讨
引用本文:周友军.我国共同侵权制度的再探讨[J].社会科学,2010(1).
作者姓名:周友军
作者单位:北京航空航天大学法学院,北京,100191
基金项目:国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目 
摘    要:在侵权法立法之际,我们应当再次探讨该制度,以构建完整的、妥当的共同侵权制度.就共同加害行为而言,行为的"共同"的认定应采共同故意说,行为人应承担连带责任.就拟制的共同加害行为而言,应妥当认定教唆人和帮助人,同时应以责任能力为基础,来确立教唆或帮助未成年人或精神病人时的责任承担.就共同危险行为而言,它是指加害人不明,行为人应承担连带责任,并可以通过举证因果关系不存在而免责.此外,共同加害行为制度不能扩张适用于无过错责任案件,而共同危险行为制度可以扩张适用于无过错责任案件;团伙成员的责任制度不宜规定在侵权法之中.

关 键 词:共同侵权  共同加害行为  拟制的共同加害行为  共同危险行为

Reexamination of the Institution about the Plurality of Responsible Actors
Zhou Youjun.Reexamination of the Institution about the Plurality of Responsible Actors[J].Journal of Social Sciences,2010(1).
Authors:Zhou Youjun
Abstract:As the legislation is drafting the tort law in China,reexamination of the institution about the plurality of responsible actors is necessary,in order to give some suggestions for the legislators.When the plaintiffs commit collective wrongful conduct and take the solidary liability,they must knowingly participate in it.If the minors or mentally disabled persons are instigated or encouraged to commit a tort,they take the liability themselves after they have infringed the standard of care that the law sets for...
Keywords:Plurality of responsible actors  Collective wrongful conduct  Instigate or encourage  Alternative causation  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号