首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

财政扶贫政策精准减贫绩效研究
引用本文:黄林秀,邹冬寒,陈祥,吕子尧.财政扶贫政策精准减贫绩效研究[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2019,45(5):59-66.
作者姓名:黄林秀  邹冬寒  陈祥  吕子尧
作者单位:1. 西南大学 经济管理学院;2. 四川大学 经济学院;3. 西南大学 政治与公共管理学院, 重庆 400715
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“连片特困地区精准扶贫的实践路径研究”(15XSH015),项目负责人:黄林秀;中央高校基本科研业务费创新团队项目“农村区域发展理论创新与政策协同研究”(SWU1709108),项目负责人:黄林秀。
摘    要:理论梳理发现:现有研究对财政扶贫政策绩效考察主要集中于综合绩效和部门绩效,对贫困户个体绩效考核严重不足。通过对我国财政扶贫政策阶段性特征分析,认为精准扶贫背景下,政策趋向实策手段精细化、实策对象微观化,存在政策运用的合理性和政策运用的精准性要求。因此,采用问卷调查和统计分析方法对微观政策绩效展开分析,认为主要存在短期政策有效、长期政策耗损、一般贫困者成为政策短板等问题,并进一步提出以贫困户满意度作为绩效判断标准、以完善制度保障作为绩效改进基础和以发展为导向兼顾公平作为政策绩效目标的优化路径。

关 键 词:财政扶贫政策  精准扶贫  农户  贫困户  乡村振兴
收稿时间:2019/5/10 0:00:00

Research on the Performance of Precision Poverty Reduction ThroughFiscal Alleviation Policies: Poor Farmers as a Perspective
HUANG Linxiu,ZOU Donghan,CHEN Xiang,LV Ziyao.Research on the Performance of Precision Poverty Reduction ThroughFiscal Alleviation Policies: Poor Farmers as a Perspective[J].Journal of Southwest University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2019,45(5):59-66.
Authors:HUANG Linxiu  ZOU Donghan  CHEN Xiang  LV Ziyao
Abstract:Through a review of related theories, it is found that the existing researches mainly focus on the comprehensive performance and department performance, and evaluation on theperformance of individual poor households is far from sufficient. Through the analysis of the phased characteristics of the fiscal poverty alleviation policy in China, it is believed that in the background of precision poverty alleviation, the policy tends to be means refinement and objects microcosmic, and there are requirements about the rationality of the policy application and the precision of the policy application. Therefore, by adopting the method of questionnaire investigation and statistical analysis to analyze the micro policy performance, it is concluded that there are some problems, including short-term policy effectiveness, long-term policy ineffectiveness, and the general poor people outside policy coverage. Furthermore, it puts forward the optimization path of taking the satisfaction of poor households as the performance judgment standard, perfecting the system guarantee as the basis of performance improvement and taking development as the orientation and giving consideration to fairness as the policy performance goal.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号