| 20世纪30年代对“商资归农”活动的三种批判意见——骆耕漠、韦东、李龙门主张之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许永峰.20世纪30年代对“商资归农”活动的三种批判意见——骆耕漠、韦东、李龙门主张之比较[J].山西大同大学学报（社会科学版）,2012,26(2):28-31. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许永峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山西大同大学文史学院,山西大同,037009 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 山西大同大学博士科研启动经费资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪30年代",商资归农"活动遭到了一些社会人士的尖锐批评,骆耕漠、韦东、李龙门为其中的三个代表人物。他们的批判反映了这场活动中客观存在的一些问题,但各自的理论依据又不尽相同,一定程度上折射出国人对当时中国农村出路问题的思考。
|
| 关 键 词： | “商资归农” 批判 骆耕漠 韦东 李龙门 |
Three Kinds of Criticial Advice on the Activity of ＂Commercial Capital Returned to Countrysides＂ in 1930s |
| |
| XU Yong-feng.Three Kinds of Criticial Advice on the Activity of ＂Commercial Capital Returned to Countrysides＂ in 1930s[J].Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition),2012,26(2):28-31. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Yong-feng |
| |
| Institution: | XU Yong-feng(School of Chinese History Litevature and,Shanxi Datong University,Datong Shanxi,037009) |
| |
| Abstract: | In 1930s,the activity of"commercial capital returned to countrysides" was criticized sharply by some people in the society.LUO Geng-mo,WEI Dong and LI Long-men were representatives.Their comments reflected some objective questions of the activity,but their own theoretical bases were not consistent entirely,from which reflected that countrymen’s thoughts on Chinese countrysides’ fortune then to a certain extent. |
| |
| Keywords: | 'commercial capital returned to countrysides' criticism LUO Geng-mo WEI Dong LI Long-men |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
