| 司马迁对“六经“”与史学关系的认识 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱发建.司马迁对“六经“”与史学关系的认识[J].湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版),2003,28(3):78-80. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱发建 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 朱发建（湖南师范大学,文学院,湖南,长沙,410081） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在对"六经"的认识中,司马迁具体阐述了"六经源于史"的观点.他对"六经"性质的认识接近儒家弟子的观念,而不同于道家的说法.但"六经"并不是他心目中的史书,他明确提出<史记>与<春秋>的区别,<春秋>是借"史"而"言道"的经书,<史记>是载道之"史",从而在中国古代最早提出了"经史有别"的观念.
|
| 关 键 词： | 司马迁 六经 史学 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-489X(2003)03-0078-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年3月12日 |
Sima Qian's Viewpoint on the Relationship between the Classics of Confucianism and Historiography |
| |
| ZHU Fa - jian.Sima Qian's Viewpoint on the Relationship between the Classics of Confucianism and Historiography[J].Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science:Social Science Edition,2003,28(3):78-80. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Fa - jian |
| |
| Abstract: | Sima Qian, who disagreed to the thought of Tao, expatiated on the view that the Classics of Confucianism came from history record . His thought was similar to Confucianism. But the Classics weren' t the historiography in his mind. He clearly differentiated The Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu) from History Record (Shiji), and was the first to bring forward the idea that there was difference between the Classics and history in ancient China. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sima Qian the classics of Confucianism historiography |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
