| 先秦名学与亚里士多德的范畴 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈声柏. 先秦名学与亚里士多德的范畴[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2003, 31(2): 73-77 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈声柏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 兰州大学,哲学与社会学系,甘肃,兰州,730000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自十九世纪晚期始 ,我们已习惯将先秦的名学视为中国古代的逻辑学。在讨论先秦儒家的正名思想和墨家的名辩思想时 ,也总是以亚里士多德的范畴思想去附会。基于这样一种认识背景 ,本文试从思维的目的和方法两个方面将中国先秦名学的有关思想与亚里士多德的范畴理论作一比较研究 ,以期呈现出两者迥异的思维方式 ,由此质疑“‘名’是‘范畴’”的观点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 名 范畴 思维 目的 方法 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-2804(2003)02-0073-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-07-23 |
Logic of the Pre-Qin Period and Aristotle''''s Category |
| |
| CHEN Sheng-bai. Logic of the Pre-Qin Period and Aristotle''''s Category[J]. Journal of Lanzhor University(Social Sciences), 2003, 31(2): 73-77 |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Sheng-bai |
| |
| Abstract: | Since the end of 19th century, many authors have interpreted Pre-Qin thought of Ming as Logic in ancient China, and have always interpreted thought of Ming of Pre-Qin Confucian and Mo school from category of Aristotle. We oppose this. The author of the article has studied on contrasting between Pre-Qin thought of Ming and Aristotle's theory of category from purpose and method of thinking, in order to expose characteristics of Pre-Qin thought of Ming. |
| |
| Keywords: | ming category thinking purpose method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
