|
|||||
|
|
| 史学认识的检验都是间接检验 | |
| 引用本文： | 赵兴彬. 史学认识的检验都是间接检验[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 6(1): 63-67 |
| 作者姓名： | 赵兴彬 |
| 作者单位： | 泰山学院历史系,山东,泰安,271021 |
| 摘 要： | 史学认识不是都可以检验的,可以检验的史学认识都是间接检验。检验的标准是现今的社会实践和史学实践。为保证史学认识检验的可信度,必须把从前的"证实性"检验方式,转变为波普尔倡导的"证伪"性检验方式。 |
| 关 键 词： | 史学认识 间接检验 证伪方式 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8091(2004)01-0063-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-08-14 |
Inspection of history knowledge is all examined indirectly |
|
| ZHAO Xing-bin. Inspection of history knowledge is all examined indirectly[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 2004, 6(1): 63-67 | |
| Authors: | ZHAO Xing-bin |
| Abstract: | Not all the history knowledge can be examined,but the inspection of history knowledge that can be examined is indirect one.The inspection standards are social practice and history practice.In order to guarantee the credibility of the inspection of history knowledge,we must change the former inspection way of "verifying" into "falsification" which is advocated by Popper,K.R. |
| Keywords: | history knowledge examine indirectly falsification way |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |