民族志书写的自反性与真实性

在民族志书写的后现代转向中，实验民族志以其书写的实践反驳了传统科学民族志的绝对客观性的虚假立场，这样的一种书写姿态是一种以实践者本身为实践对象的自反性（reflexivity）客观立场。在这种立场的统摄下，民族志文本书写对于真实性的定位逐渐脱离传统的科学民族志书写的真实性，实验民族志作者借助话语表述的真实态度传达着其对客体真实性的理解。此种意义下的真实性有更多地向文学领域真实性靠拢的可能性。与此同时，在民族志书写的小说化倾向中，客体的存在更可能意味着向词语召唤的功能。

Reflexivity and Authenticity of the Writing of Ethnography

In the transmission of post modern writing of ethnography, experimental ethnography with its practical features retorts the false standpoints of absolute objectivity in traditional scientific ethnog- raphy. This kind of writing attitude is the reflexivity objective standpoints taking practitioners as the practical subjects. Under the guidance of this kind of standpoints, the definition of authenticity of the writing of ethnographic text gradually escapes from the authenticity of the traditional scientific writing of ethnography. The writers of experimental ethnography indicate the understanding of authenticity of object based on the authentic attitude of discourse expression. The authenticity is more likely to ap- proach the authenticity of literature. Meanwhile, in the novelization of ethnography writing, the existence of object might mean the calling function to words.