论合同解除的生效规则

关于合同解除的生效规则存在着三种不同的立法模式。在不同的模式下，当事人私权在法律实现上的路径及成本存在着巨大的差异。大陆《合同法》采用了形成权解除主义模式，然而到了最高法院的司法解释，却将其改头换面为裁判解除主义模式。这种更改，漠视了不同模式之间的差异对当事人私权实现的意义，引发了新的利益冲突，同时也反映了作为公权的裁判权对私权的漠视与不正当侵犯。

Study on effective rules of contract-relieving

There are three legislative modes of effective rules of contract - relieving. In different modes the ways and costs of the litigant＇ s privatc rights arc quite diffcrent. The Contract Law is in the mode of forming - rights relieving, but it is explained by the highest Court in the mode of judicature relieving. This kind of change not only neglects the differences of realizing the litigant＇ s private rights in different modes, but also leads new conflicts of interests and reflects the neglect and illegal, intrusion of public judicature to private rights.