Lessons learned using a values-engaged approach to attend to culture,diversity, and equity in a STEM program evaluation |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Asheville, NC 28804, United States;2. Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Department of Community Health Behavior & Education, Statesboro, GA 30460, United States;3. University of South Florida, Department of Educational Measurement and Research, Tampa, FL 33620, United States;1. Oregon State University, 118B Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States;2. California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States;3. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States;4. University of Maryland, College Park, Columbia, MD, United States;5. Yale University, CT, United States;1. Indiana University School of Medicine, 1110 West Michigan Street, Suite 200, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States;2. Northern Nebraska AHEC, 110 N. 16th Street, Suite 2, Norfolk, NE 68701, United States;3. Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, 42 East Laurel Road – Suite 1800, Stratford, NJ 08084, United States;4. University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States;1. Dept. of Educational Leadership, Research and Technology, Western Michigan University, United States;2. W. K. Kellogg Foundation, United States;1. Payson Program for Global Development, Tulane University, 6823 St Charles Ave, New Orleans, LA 70118, United States;2. African Women in Agricultural Research and Development (AWARD), Hosted by World Agroforestry Centre, United Nations Avenue, Gigiri, P.O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya;1. Faculty of Economics and Management, National University of Malaysia, UKM Bangi, 43600 Selangor, Malaysia;2. Department of Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School, Kilevej 14, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark;3. Syntek Corporation, 4.669 Evaluation and Planning, 2279 Mershon Drive, Ann Arbor, 48103 MI, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Evaluation must attend meaningfully and respectfully to issues of culture, race, diversity, power, and equity. This attention is especially critical within the evaluation of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educational programming, which has an explicit agenda of broadening participation. The purpose of this article is to report lessons learned from the implementation of a values-engaged, educative (Greene et al., 2006) evaluation within a multi-year STEM education program setting. This meta-evaluation employed a case study design using data from evaluator weekly systematic reflections, review of evaluation and program artifacts, stakeholder interviews, and peer review and assessment. The main findings from this study are (a) explicit attention to culture, diversity, and equity was initially challenged by organizational culture and under-developed evaluator–stakeholder professional relationship and (b) evidence of successful engagement of culture, diversity, and equity emerged in formal evaluation criteria and documents, and informal dialogue and discussion with stakeholders. The paper concludes with lessons learned and implications for practice. |
| |
Keywords: | Values-engaged STEM Culture Diversity Equity |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|