Development of an evaluation framework for publicly funded R&D projects: The case of Korea's Next Generation Network |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, College of Medicine, Cheongju, Chungbuk National University, South Korea;2. Information Analysis Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Seoul, South Korea;3. Korea National Industrial Convergence Center, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea;1. Oregon State University, 118B Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States;2. California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States;3. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States;4. University of Maryland, College Park, Columbia, MD, United States;5. Yale University, CT, United States;1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Asheville, NC 28804, United States;2. Georgia Southern University, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Department of Community Health Behavior & Education, Statesboro, GA 30460, United States;3. University of South Florida, Department of Educational Measurement and Research, Tampa, FL 33620, United States;1. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand;2. Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand;3. College of Education, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand;4. Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand;1. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States;2. Iowa Department of Public Health, Des Moines, IA 50319, United States;1. Dept. of Educational Leadership, Research and Technology, Western Michigan University, United States;2. W. K. Kellogg Foundation, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | For decades, efforts have been made globally to measure the performance of large-scale public projects and to develop a framework to perform such measurements due to the complexity and dynamics of R&D and stakeholder interests. Still, limitations such as the use of a simply modified model and the lack of a comprehensive viewpoint are prevalent in existing approaches. In light of these research gaps, this study suggests a practical model to evaluate the performance of large-scale and publicly funded projects. The proposed model suggests a standard matrix framework of indices that evaluates the performance of particular elements in an industrial ecosystem in vertical categories and the economic and technological outcomes of those elements in horizontal categories. Based on the application of a balanced scorecard, this study uses mixed methodologies such as social network analysis, inter-industry analysis, and the analytic hierarchy process. Finally, the model evaluates the performance of Korea's Next Generation Network project as a case study. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
